PCBenchmark/Results/Core i5 11320H + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE26OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 12 September 2026 · 19:21 EEST

Core i5 11320H+Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU29

Processor throughput

Single thread
355.73 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,907.17 Mops/s
Compression proxy
393.8 MB/s
GPU5

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
610.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
47.8 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY67

System memory

Effective bandwidth
19.53 GB/s
Latency proxy
18.3 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.85 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Core i5 11320H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +232.1%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xe DG1Xe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020
    +144.4%higher estimate
  3. Intel H3C XG310H3C Graphics · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +108.6%higher estimate
  4. Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 MobileHD Graphics-M(Coffee Lake) · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY79.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES20.38%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 85/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218389,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Core i5 11320H",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "graphics_card_id": 2349
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 20.383
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 355727800.357,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1907171618.485,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 393.782
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 19.533,
            "latency_ns": 18.312
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 47.787,
            "compute_gflops": 610.499,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.846,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 13.01148757,
        "gpu": 0.50874917
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 29,
        "gpu": 5,
        "memory": 67,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 26,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 29,
        "gpu": 5,
        "memory": 67,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 26,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again