PCBenchmark/Results/AMD FX-8350 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 browser benchmark
PC SCORE14OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 6 October 2026 · 19:05 EEST

AMD FX-8350+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:56
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU16

Processor throughput

Single thread
410.61 Mops/s
Multi thread
828.80 Mops/s
Compression proxy
339.2 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
438.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
45.0 FPS
Frame time p95
66.66 ms
MEMORY38

System memory

Effective bandwidth
7.55 GB/s
Latency proxy
97.3 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.46 GB/s
Tested allocation
256 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD FX-8350 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY74.9%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES25.11%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
2
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Firefox 157 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
1.000 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Good · 77/100
Performance index
13.5 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 56229,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD FX-8350",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 157,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 415
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 25.114
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 410609972.603,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 828795550.907,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 339.207
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 7.553,
            "latency_ns": 97.259,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 45.013,
            "compute_gflops": 438.76,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 66.66
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 256,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.459,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 9.58333057,
        "gpu": 0.36563333,
        "memory": 0.53620732
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 38,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 38,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "performance_index": 13.53,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again