PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 browser benchmark
PC SCORE74OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEB
Excellent quality run 14 September 2026 · 22:17 EEST

Intel Core i9-14900K+NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:56
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,014.09 Mops/s
Multi thread
12,916.16 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,058.5 MB/s
GPU37

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
4,485.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
60.0 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY97

System memory

Effective bandwidth
71.16 GB/s
Latency proxy
9.2 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
3.82 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-14900K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. Intel Core i9-14900KRaptor Lake Refresh · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. Intel Core i7-14700KRaptor Lake Refresh · 20 cores / 28 threads · 2023
    −8.0%lower estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-14600KRaptor Lake Refresh · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2023
    −21.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +15.0%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +4.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +0.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000Quadro Turing(Tx000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA P104-100Mining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −6.5%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    −9.3%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −9.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
32
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 100/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55756,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-14900K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000",
        "logical_cores": 32,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 29,
        "graphics_card_id": 2296
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1014085139.646,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 12916164238.901,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1058.516
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 71.161,
            "latency_ns": 9.236
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 60.013,
            "compute_gflops": 4485.362,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.824,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 51.81976301,
        "gpu": 3.73780167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 37,
        "memory": 97,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 74,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 37,
        "memory": 97,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 74,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again