PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-10600T + Intel UHD Graphics 630 browser benchmark
PC SCORE4OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 8 September 2026 · 01:12 EEST

Intel Core i5-10600T+Intel UHD Graphics 630

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION05:09
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU5

Processor throughput

Single thread
26.60 Mops/s
Multi thread
644.57 Mops/s
Compression proxy
147.1 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
145.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.3 FPS
Frame time p95
850.00 ms
MEMORY6

System memory

Effective bandwidth
2.67 GB/s
Latency proxy
242.1 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.16 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-10600T comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Comet Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-10900TComet Lake · 10 cores / 20 threads · 2020
    +21.5%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-10700TComet Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2020
    +11.9%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i3-10100Comet Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    +4.4%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-10600TComet Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i3-10305TComet Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −7.0%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel UHD Graphics 630 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +484.8%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xe DG1Xe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020
    +330.4%higher estimate
  3. Intel H3C XG310H3C Graphics · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +267.4%higher estimate
  4. Intel UHD Graphics 630HD Graphics(Comet Lake) · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY20.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW309 SEC DROPPED FRAMES79.59%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 308569,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-10600T",
        "gpu_name": "Intel UHD Graphics 630",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1366,
        "graphics_card_id": 80
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 309,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 79.587
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 26597889.374,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 644571798.993,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 147.115
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.667,
            "latency_ns": 242.131
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.261,
            "compute_gflops": 145.637,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 850
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.16,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 2.45386987,
        "gpu": 0.12136417
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 6,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 4,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 6,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 4,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again