PC SCORE68OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEC

Good quality run 12 September 2026 · 11:52 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D+AMD Radeon 880M

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:55

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU99

Processor throughput

Single thread: 997.65 Mops/s
Multi thread: 9,467.08 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 976.7 MB/s

GPU24

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 2,879.0 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 23.6 FPS
Frame time p95: 116.60 ms

MEMORY99

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 77.84 GB/s
Latency proxy: 24.4 ns
Browser RAM class: 8 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 0.43 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

AMD Ryzen 9 9900XZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2024

+1.1%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3DZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2026

−11.7%lower estimate
AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024

−28.6%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GBNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2023

+196.9%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022

+142.5%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

+29.4%higher estimate
AMD Radeon 880MNavi III IGP(Strix Point Mobile) · 2024

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019

−1.3%lower estimate
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019

−12.4%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6400Navi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

−20.0%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY39.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW55 SEC DROPPED FRAMES60.63%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 20
Browser RAM class: 8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55461,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon 880M",
        "logical_cores": 20,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 70,
        "graphics_card_id": 2785
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 55,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 60.626
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 997648626.574,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 9467082468.09,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 976.655
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 77.84,
            "latency_ns": 24.417
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 23.635,
            "compute_gflops": 2879.022,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 116.6
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.431,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 44.74025854,
        "gpu": 2.399185
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 99,
        "gpu": 24,
        "memory": 99,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 68,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 99,
        "gpu": 24,
        "memory": 99,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 68,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again