PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon w3-2423 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation browser benchmark
PC SCORE18OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 30 September 2026 · 08:08 EEST

Intel Xeon w3-2423+NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU17

Processor throughput

Single thread
377.01 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,608.48 Mops/s
Compression proxy
30.9 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY20

System memory

Effective bandwidth
11.66 GB/s
Latency proxy
1,243.3 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon w3-2423 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Sapphire Rapids desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon w3-2425Sapphire Rapids · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2023
    +18.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon w3-2423Sapphire Rapids · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    +27.6%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070GeForce 50 · 12 GB VRAM · 2025
    +15.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070GeForce 40 · 12 GB VRAM · 2023
    +9.1%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada GenerationWorkstation Ada(x000A) · 20 GB VRAM · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −11.3%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2023
    −17.5%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    −18.6%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY40.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW38 SEC RUN QUALITY40/100
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
N/A
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 38101,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon w3-2423",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "processor_id": 3275,
        "graphics_card_id": 2719
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 38,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 377013400.297,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1608479825.887,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 30.929
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 11.662,
            "latency_ns": 1243.337
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 7.47919547,
        "gpu": null
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 20,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 18,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 20,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 18,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again