PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon Gold 5423N + AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE72OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEB
Limited quality run 4 October 2026 · 00:09 EEST

Intel Xeon Gold 5423N+AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:15
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU43

Processor throughput

Single thread
474.47 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,769.63 Mops/s
Compression proxy
411.1 MB/s
GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
6,025.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
2.5 FPS
Frame time p95
907.00 ms
MEMORY73

System memory

Effective bandwidth
25.71 GB/s
Latency proxy
19.6 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon Gold 5423N comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Sapphire Rapids Edge Enhanced desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon Gold 5433NSapphire Rapids Edge Enhanced · 20 cores / 40 threads · 2023
    +5.3%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon Gold 5423NSapphire Rapids Edge Enhanced · 20 cores / 40 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 5600 XTNavi(RX 5000) · 6 GB VRAM · 2020
    +346.6%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +257.8%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 6400Navi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +121.1%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP MobileVega II IGP(Cezanne Mobile) · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon R9 M470Gem System(R9 M400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −4.3%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon E9172 MXMEmbedded(9000) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −22.4%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon E9173 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −22.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY4.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW15 SEC DROPPED FRAMES95.82%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
macOS
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 32/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 14711,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon Gold 5423N",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "macos",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 2961,
        "graphics_card_id": 2482
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 15,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 95.819
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 474471930.897,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3769626865.167,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 411.116
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 25.712,
            "latency_ns": 19.635
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 2.454,
            "compute_gflops": 6025.224,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 907
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 19.34056592,
        "gpu": 10.04204
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 43,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 73,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 72,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 43,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 73,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 72,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again