PCBenchmark/Results/intel + NVIDIA Quadro P620 browser benchmark
PC SCORE37OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 2 September 2026 · 18:31 EEST

intel+NVIDIA Quadro P620

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:58
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU54

Processor throughput

Single thread
559.64 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,335.37 Mops/s
Compression proxy
668.6 MB/s
GPU6

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
725.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
57.0 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY70

System memory

Effective bandwidth
22.12 GB/s
Latency proxy
13.1 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.35 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

intel comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA Quadro P620 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +54.0%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +33.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12WGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    +20.1%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA Quadro P620Quadro Pascal(Px200) · 2 GB VRAM · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX350GeForce MX(3xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −13.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −18.7%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −34.5%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY95.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW58 SEC DROPPED FRAMES4.96%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 96/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 57507,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "intel",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA Quadro P620",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "graphics_card_id": 2294
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 58,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 4.963
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 559637879.843,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4335369897.807,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 668.627
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 22.124,
            "latency_ns": 13.064
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 57.042,
            "compute_gflops": 725.237,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.345,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 24.08146104,
        "gpu": 0.60436417
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 54,
        "gpu": 6,
        "memory": 70,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 37,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 54,
        "gpu": 6,
        "memory": 70,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 37,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again