PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-9880H + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE29OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 16 October 2026 · 21:39 EEST

Intel Core i9-9880H+NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:37
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU34

Processor throughput

Single thread
479.71 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,379.77 Mops/s
Compression proxy
685.4 MB/s
GPU4

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
2,018.3 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
51.3 FPS
Frame time p95
17.20 ms
MEMORY76

System memory

Effective bandwidth
23.72 GB/s
Latency proxy
114.9 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
3.33 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-9880H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E-2286MCoffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    +4.2%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-9880HCoffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i7-8700BCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    −0.8%lower estimate
  4. Intel Xeon E-2186MCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    −2.2%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i5-8500BCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2018
    −18.8%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +37.4%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +20.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA P106-100Mining GPUs · 6 GB VRAM · 2017
    +19.7%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA Quadro T2000 MobileQuadro Turing-M(Tx000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −18.6%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA P106MMining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −18.9%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −23.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY85.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW217 SEC DROPPED FRAMES14.46%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 98/100
Performance index
28.8 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 217287,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-9880H",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "turing",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 2029,
        "graphics_card_id": 2392
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 217,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 14.461
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 479711435.104,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3379765027.599,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 685.406
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 23.719,
            "latency_ns": 114.917,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 51.343,
            "compute_gflops": 2018.281,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.328,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 20.59723661,
        "gpu": 1.68190083,
        "memory": 1.06416421
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 34,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 76,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 29,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 34,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 76,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 29,
        "performance_index": 28.83,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again