PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7+8700 + Intel UHD Graphics 630 browser benchmark
PC SCORE43OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 10 October 2026 · 16:59 EEST

Intel Core i7+8700+Intel UHD Graphics 630

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:10
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU32

Processor throughput

Single thread
523.31 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,810.49 Mops/s
Compression proxy
619.1 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY68

System memory

Effective bandwidth
19.51 GB/s
Latency proxy
110.0 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7+8700 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-9900Coffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    +16.5%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7+8700Coffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-9600KFCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2019
    −4.6%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i9-9900TCoffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    −7.7%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-9350KCoffee Lake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2019
    −16.3%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel UHD Graphics 630 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / RUN QUALITY17.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW10 SEC RUN QUALITY17/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • No GPU API was available in this browser.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
11
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
N/A
Browser
Brave 147 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 17/100
Performance index
42.5 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 9592,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7+8700",
        "gpu_name": "Intel UHD Graphics 630",
        "logical_cores": 11,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "brave",
        "browser_version": 147,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 1942
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 10,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 523312126.57,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2810492168.628,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 619.128
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 19.514,
            "latency_ns": 110.029,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 19.41091941,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.95176141
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "gpu_unavailable",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 32,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 68,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 43,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 32,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 68,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 43,
        "performance_index": 42.52,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again