PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-8500Y + AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 browser benchmark
PC SCORE7OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 7 October 2026 · 22:18 EEST

Intel Core i7-8500Y+AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:02
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU6

Processor throughput

Single thread
136.65 Mops/s
Multi thread
552.01 Mops/s
Compression proxy
45.2 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
88.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.0 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY25

System memory

Effective bandwidth
7.70 GB/s
Latency proxy
355.7 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.92 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-8500Y comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Amber Lake Y desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i5-10210YAmber Lake Y · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    +9.0%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-8500YAmber Lake Y · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-8310YAmber Lake Y · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2019
    −1.8%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i3-10100YAmber Lake Y · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2021
    −9.7%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core m3-8100YAmber Lake Y · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    −22.2%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +164.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon E9390 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +134.9%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 560Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    +57.2%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200Radeon Pro Polaris(WX x200) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon E9172 MXMEmbedded(9000) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −24.7%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon E9173 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −24.7%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon E9174 MXMEmbedded(9000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −24.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW62 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
  • The browser reported more threads than the selected CPU has; the selected CPU is probably wrong.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 0/100
Performance index
6.8 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 61963,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-8500Y",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "gen-9",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1930,
        "graphics_card_id": 2419
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 62,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 136650008.549,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 552007527.512,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 45.197
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 7.695,
            "latency_ns": 355.65,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0,
            "compute_gflops": 88.672,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.923,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 3.50523011,
        "gpu": 0.07389333,
        "memory": 0.34475306
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "on_battery",
        "thread_mismatch",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 6,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 25,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 7,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 6,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 25,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 7,
        "performance_index": 6.77,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again