PC SCORE63OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEC

Excellent quality run 14 September 2026 · 22:41 EEST

Intel Core i7-14700K+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:56

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread: 947.73 Mops/s
Multi thread: 14,704.76 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 992.0 MB/s

GPU11

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 1,351.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 57.2 FPS
Frame time p95: 16.80 ms

MEMORY96

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 67.00 GB/s
Latency proxy: 13.0 ns
Browser RAM class: 32 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 4.68 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core i9-14900KRaptor Lake Refresh · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2023

+8.6%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-14700KRaptor Lake Refresh · 20 cores / 28 threads · 2023

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core i5-14600KRaptor Lake Refresh · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2023

−14.9%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017

+282.7%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016

+201.9%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016

+104.7%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016

−13.1%lower estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017

−47.2%lower estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2021

−65.0%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY95.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES4.78%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 28
Browser RAM class: 32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Excellent · 96/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55669,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-14700K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 28,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 28,
        "graphics_card_id": 2
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 4.779
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 947730098.428,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 14704757581.85,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 991.967
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 66.995,
            "latency_ns": 12.971
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 57.157,
            "compute_gflops": 1351.788,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 4.681,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 52.43595814,
        "gpu": 1.12649
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 11,
        "memory": 96,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 63,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 11,
        "memory": 96,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 63,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again