PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-9600K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 browser benchmark
PC SCORE27OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 13 September 2026 · 15:15 EEST

Intel Core i5-9600K+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:41
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU39

Processor throughput

Single thread
528.96 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,151.17 Mops/s
Compression proxy
648.7 MB/s
GPU3

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
158.1 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
5.6 FPS
Frame time p95
183.50 ms
MEMORY53

System memory

Effective bandwidth
13.13 GB/s
Latency proxy
38.1 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-9600K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake Refresh desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-9900KCoffee Lake Refresh · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    +29.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-9700KCoffee Lake Refresh · 8 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    +15.3%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-9600KCoffee Lake Refresh · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +174.9%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +141.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +62.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12WGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −8.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce MX350GeForce MX(3xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −34.4%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2021
    −59.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY17.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW221 SEC DROPPED FRAMES82.41%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
6
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 220505,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-9600K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630",
        "logical_cores": 6,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 7,
        "graphics_card_id": 2609
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 221,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 82.407
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 528964581.366,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2151172911.048,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 648.745
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 13.13,
            "latency_ns": 38.05
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 5.596,
            "compute_gflops": 158.138,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 183.5
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 17.68187501,
        "gpu": 0.26356333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 39,
        "gpu": 3,
        "memory": 53,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 27,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 39,
        "gpu": 3,
        "memory": 53,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 27,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again