PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-8265U + Intel HD Graphics 400 Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE6OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 25 September 2026 · 20:33 EEST

Intel Core i5-8265U+Intel HD Graphics 400 Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:45
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU7

Processor throughput

Single thread
106.32 Mops/s
Multi thread
559.35 Mops/s
Compression proxy
51.8 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
122.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.4 FPS
Frame time p95
149.78 ms
MEMORY14

System memory

Effective bandwidth
6.24 GB/s
Latency proxy
206.3 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-8265U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Whiskey Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-8565UWhiskey Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    +15.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i5-8265UWhiskey Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i3-8145UWhiskey Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    −15.5%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel HD Graphics 400 Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +2,141.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xe DG1Xe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020
    +1,550.0%higher estimate
  3. Intel H3C XG310H3C Graphics · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +1,308.3%higher estimate
  4. Intel HD Graphics 400 MobileHD Graphics-T(Airmont) · 2015
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY20.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW45 SEC DROPPED FRAMES79.41%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 45267,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-8265U",
        "gpu_name": "Intel HD Graphics 400 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1632,
        "graphics_card_id": 2071
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 45,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 79.414
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 106323094.124,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 559348957.026,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 51.782
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 6.24,
            "latency_ns": 206.285
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.372,
            "compute_gflops": 122.241,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 149.78
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 3.27516124,
        "gpu": 0.203735
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 7,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 14,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 6,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 7,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 14,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 6,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again