PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-3570 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 browser benchmark
PC SCORE32OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 11 September 2026 · 12:29 EEST

Intel Core i5-3570+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:46
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU24

Processor throughput

Single thread
396.99 Mops/s
Multi thread
956.82 Mops/s
Compression proxy
455.1 MB/s
GPU43

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
2,602.3 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
9.0 FPS
Frame time p95
140.00 ms
MEMORY24

System memory

Effective bandwidth
5.29 GB/s
Latency proxy
65.2 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-3570 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +126.3%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +64.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    +11.7%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970GeForce 900 · 4 GB VRAM · 2014
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −45.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −52.6%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −76.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY15.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW46 SEC DROPPED FRAMES84.68%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 45589,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-3570",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1492,
        "graphics_card_id": 1846
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 46,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 84.68
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 396986134.003,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 956824373.303,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 455.069
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.29,
            "latency_ns": 65.189
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 8.996,
            "compute_gflops": 2602.338,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 140
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 10.620164,
        "gpu": 4.33723
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 24,
        "gpu": 43,
        "memory": 24,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 32,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 24,
        "gpu": 43,
        "memory": 24,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 32,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again