PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM browser benchmark
PC SCORE42OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 3 September 2026 · 23:00 EEST

Intel Core i5-13400F+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:48
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU66

Processor throughput

Single thread
709.55 Mops/s
Multi thread
5,711.99 Mops/s
Compression proxy
694.1 MB/s
GPU4

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
246.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.1 FPS
Frame time p95
0.09 ms
MEMORY76

System memory

Effective bandwidth
29.48 GB/s
Latency proxy
25.5 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-13400F comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-13700Raptor Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2023
    +19.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-13900TRaptor Lake · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2023
    +8.2%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-13400FRaptor Lake · 10 cores / 16 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i7-13700TRaptor Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2023
    −1.6%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-13100Raptor Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2023
    −19.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070GeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +151.1%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +100.2%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GBGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    +57.5%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEMGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA RTX A2000 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −25.5%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA RTX A500 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −32.4%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA RTX A1000 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −42.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW48 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Fair · 65/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 48401,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-13400F",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1419,
        "graphics_card_id": 2617
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 48,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 709552583.462,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 5711989990.984,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 694.052
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 29.479,
            "latency_ns": 25.477
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.127,
            "compute_gflops": 246.758,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0.094
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 29.78927664,
        "gpu": 0.41126333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 66,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 76,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 42,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 66,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 76,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 42,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again