Intel Core i5-11400H

CPU category score 20/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODESTRESS GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:32

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU20

Processor throughput

Single thread: 268.44 Mops/s
Multi thread: 1,673.32 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 614.9 MB/s

GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY17

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 5.46 GB/s
Latency proxy: 529.6 ns
Browser RAM class: 8 GB class

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021

+22.2%higher estimate
Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021

+8.9%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-11600HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021

+2.2%higher estimate
Intel Core i5-11400HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core i7-11375HTiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

−5.5%lower estimate
Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

−30.1%lower estimate
Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020

−49.9%lower estimate

03 / RUN QUALITY100.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW92 SEC RUN QUALITY100/100

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: CPU + Memory
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 12
Browser RAM class: 8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: NOT RUN
Browser: Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution: 0.100 ms
Memory working set: 256 MB
Run quality: Excellent · 100/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale: Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 92000,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-11400H",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 1373,
        "graphics_card_id": 2536
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 92,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 268437839.931,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1673322876.444,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 614.862
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.457,
            "latency_ns": 529.554,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.06139861,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.23987334
    },
    "quality_flags": [],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 17,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 17,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again