PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Celeron N4100 + Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE9OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 25 September 2026 · 11:08 EEST

Intel Celeron N4100+Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:46
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU15

Processor throughput

Single thread
280.80 Mops/s
Multi thread
770.03 Mops/s
Compression proxy
155.6 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
57.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
1.4 FPS
Frame time p95
1,982.76 ms
MEMORY11

System memory

Effective bandwidth
5.20 GB/s
Latency proxy
173.3 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Celeron N4100 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain enough core and clock data to build a responsible CPU estimate for this model.

GPU POSITION

Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc Pro A40Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022
    +324.4%higher estimate
  2. Intel Arc A350Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +274.4%higher estimate
  3. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +228.0%higher estimate
  4. Intel UHD Graphics 770 MobileHD Graphics-M(Raptor Lake) · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY2.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW46 SEC DROPPED FRAMES97.60%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 45753,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Celeron N4100",
        "gpu_name": "Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1123,
        "graphics_card_id": 2683
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 46,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 97.595
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 280804464.479,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 770031710.091,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 155.634
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.203,
            "latency_ns": 173.324
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 1.446,
            "compute_gflops": 57.424,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 1982.76
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 6.84004075,
        "gpu": 0.09570667
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 15,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 11,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 9,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 15,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 11,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 9,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again