PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS + AMD Radeon 780M browser benchmark
PC SCORE38OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 14 September 2026 · 13:40 EEST

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS+AMD Radeon 780M

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU49

Processor throughput

Single thread
545.18 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,500.27 Mops/s
Compression proxy
663.3 MB/s
GPU19

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
2,322.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
23.1 FPS
Frame time p95
100.30 ms
MEMORY54

System memory

Effective bandwidth
14.67 GB/s
Latency proxy
42.4 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.58 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon 780M comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 6750 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2022
    +49.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GBNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2023
    +48.3%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 6650 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    +21.1%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon 780MNavi III IGP(Phoenix) · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon Instinct MI8Radeon Instinct(MIx) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −8.1%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −35.4%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6400Navi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −60.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY38.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES61.47%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 217961,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon 780M",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "graphics_card_id": 113
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 61.47
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 545178745.505,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3500269189.68,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 663.315
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 14.674,
            "latency_ns": 42.369
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 23.08,
            "compute_gflops": 2322.688,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 100.3
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.584,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 21.84101687,
        "gpu": 1.93557333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 49,
        "gpu": 19,
        "memory": 54,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 38,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 49,
        "gpu": 19,
        "memory": 54,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 38,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again