PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Phenom 975 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 browser benchmark
PC SCORE18OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 15 September 2026 · 04:53 EEST

AMD Phenom 975+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU16

Processor throughput

Single thread
213.33 Mops/s
Multi thread
762.04 Mops/s
Compression proxy
332.3 MB/s
GPU14

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,638.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
56.3 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY30

System memory

Effective bandwidth
4.20 GB/s
Latency proxy
37.5 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.76 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Phenom 975 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain enough core and clock data to build a responsible CPU estimate for this model.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +32.7%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    +31.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA P106-100Mining GPUs · 6 GB VRAM · 2017
    +31.5%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770GeForce 700 · 2 GB VRAM · 2013
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −10.5%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA P106MMining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −10.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 710GeForce 700 · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −95.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY93.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES6.21%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 87/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19164,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Phenom 975",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 475,
        "graphics_card_id": 1657
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 6.209
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 213332540.008,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 762042381.503,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 332.332
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 4.202,
            "latency_ns": 37.522
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 56.322,
            "compute_gflops": 1638.437,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.761,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 7.10234346,
        "gpu": 1.36536417
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 14,
        "memory": 30,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 18,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 14,
        "memory": 30,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 18,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again