PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Ryzen 9 5900XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 browser benchmark
PC SCORE79OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEB
Limited quality run 19 September 2026 · 01:17 EEST

Ryzen 9 5900XT+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION02:02
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU81

Processor throughput

Single thread
782.33 Mops/s
Multi thread
7,154.61 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,023.9 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY75

System memory

Effective bandwidth
26.93 GB/s
Latency proxy
11.5 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Ryzen 9 5900XT comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +40.5%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +15.7%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +11.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −15.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −22.0%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −22.0%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY40.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW122 SEC RUN QUALITY40/100
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
10
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
N/A
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 121703,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Ryzen 9 5900XT",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060",
        "logical_cores": 10,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "graphics_card_id": 14
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 122,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 782325100.259,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 7154609902.699,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1023.914
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 26.931,
            "latency_ns": 11.548
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 36.63656364,
        "gpu": null
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 81,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 75,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 79,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 81,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 75,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 79,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again