PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/ryzen 9 5900xt + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT browser benchmark
PC SCORE82OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEA
Good quality run 1 October 2026 · 04:50 EEST

ryzen 9 5900xt+AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Excellent performance with a strong balance across the measured workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU89

Processor throughput

Single thread
744.05 Mops/s
Multi thread
9,448.43 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,036.5 MB/s
GPU79

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
9,527.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
21.2 FPS
Frame time p95
83.40 ms
MEMORY75

System memory

Effective bandwidth
27.50 GB/s
Latency proxy
10.9 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
3.11 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

ryzen 9 5900xt comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 6950 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2022
    +14.0%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2020
    +11.1%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon Instinct MI200Radeon Instinct(MIx) · 64 GB VRAM · 2021
    +9.1%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 6800Navi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2020
    −22.0%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 6750 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2022
    −35.8%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6700 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    −36.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY35.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES64.60%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
32
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218463,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "ryzen 9 5900xt",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT",
        "logical_cores": 32,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "graphics_card_id": 56
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 64.604
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 744049613.612,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 9448427798.639,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1036.479
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 27.5,
            "latency_ns": 10.94
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 21.231,
            "compute_gflops": 9527.929,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 83.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.107,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 40.23179645,
        "gpu": 7.93994083
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 89,
        "gpu": 79,
        "memory": 75,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 82,
        "grade": "A"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 89,
        "gpu": 79,
        "memory": 75,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 82,
        "grade": "A",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again