PCBenchmark/Results/ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 browser benchmark
PC SCORE66OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEC
Excellent quality run 4 October 2026 · 11:59 EEST

ryzen 7 5700+AMD Radeon RX 9060

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:55
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU60

Processor throughput

Single thread
698.29 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,893.70 Mops/s
Compression proxy
970.3 MB/s
GPU72

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
8,688.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
95.2 FPS
Frame time p95
15.10 ms
MEMORY67

System memory

Effective bandwidth
19.52 GB/s
Latency proxy
14.3 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.65 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

ryzen 7 5700 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9060 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +68.6%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +60.0%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +19.6%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2020
    −3.2%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 7400Navi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −23.1%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GBNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2023
    −38.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY91.1%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW55 SEC DROPPED FRAMES8.90%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 93/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55347,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "ryzen 7 5700",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9060",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "graphics_card_id": 2836
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 55,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 8.904
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 698292736.818,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3893697539.65,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 970.331
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 19.517,
            "latency_ns": 14.32
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 95.245,
            "compute_gflops": 8688.196,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 15.1
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.646,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 27.15292515,
        "gpu": 7.24016333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 60,
        "gpu": 72,
        "memory": 67,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 66,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 60,
        "gpu": 72,
        "memory": 67,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 66,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again