PCBenchmark/Results/NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GPU browser benchmark
GPU CATEGORY SCORE48PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY75
Good quality run 11 October 2026 · 18:14 EEST

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GPU category score 48/100 from the graphics-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITEGPU MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:05
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPUNOT RUN

Processor throughput

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

GPU48

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
11,515.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
4.7 FPS
Frame time p95
450.94 ms
MEMORYNOT RUN

System memory

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA TITAN RTXGeForce 20 · 24 GB VRAM · 2018
    +21.3%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA TITAN VGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017
    +10.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA TITAN V CEO EditionGeForce 10 · 32 GB VRAM · 2018
    +10.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce 20 · 11 GB VRAM · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    −17.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    −25.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    −32.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY7.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW65 SEC DROPPED FRAMES92.17%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
GPU
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Firefox 157 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
1.000 ms
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "gpu",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 65329,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 3800X",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 157,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "processor_id": 615,
        "graphics_card_id": 10
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 65,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 92.167
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 4.681,
            "compute_gflops": 11515.21,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 450.94
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 19.19201667,
        "memory": null
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 48,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 48,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same GPU suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again