PCBenchmark/Results/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU browser benchmark
GPU CATEGORY SCORE1PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY92
Excellent quality run 8 October 2026 · 08:17 EEST

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GPU category score 1/100 from the graphics-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITEGPU MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:06
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPUNOT RUN

Processor throughput

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
745.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
74.3 FPS
Frame time p95
13.50 ms
MEMORYNOT RUN

System memory

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    +215.1%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +54.0%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +33.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce 700 · 2 GB VRAM · 2014
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −34.5%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce 930MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −43.9%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 710GeForce 700 · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −88.5%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY99.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW6 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.79%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
GPU
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
6
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Run quality
Excellent · 92/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "gpu",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 5920,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon X5660",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 6,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "maxwell",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 3333,
        "graphics_card_id": 1839
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 6,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0.792
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 74.311,
            "compute_gflops": 745.88,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 13.5
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 0.62156667,
        "memory": null
    },
    "quality_flags": [],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same GPU suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again