PCBenchmark/Results/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GPU browser benchmark
GPU CATEGORY SCORE14PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY96
Excellent quality run 14 October 2026 · 19:36 EEST

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

GPU category score 14/100 from the graphics-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITEGPU MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:06
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPUNOT RUN

Processor throughput

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

GPU14

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
7,019.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
49.0 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORYNOT RUN

System memory

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA TITAN VGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017
    +31.4%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA TITAN V CEO EditionGeForce 10 · 32 GB VRAM · 2018
    +31.4%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA TITAN XpGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017
    +7.1%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce 10 · 11 GB VRAM · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA TITAN X PascalGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2016
    −3.3%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    −21.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    −27.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY81.7%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW66 SEC DROPPED FRAMES18.34%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
GPU
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Run quality
Excellent · 96/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "gpu",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 66072,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-11700K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "pascal",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 18,
        "graphics_card_id": 7
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 66,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 18.344
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 49.002,
            "compute_gflops": 7019.932,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 5.84994333,
        "memory": null
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 14,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 14,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same GPU suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again