PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y + AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE browser benchmark
PC SCORE67OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEC
Limited quality run 5 October 2026 · 06:04 EEST

Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y+AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:14
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU31

Processor throughput

Single thread
167.48 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,265.37 Mops/s
Compression proxy
512.2 MB/s
GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
7,100.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
13.2 FPS
Frame time p95
101.00 ms
MEMORY72

System memory

Effective bandwidth
24.41 GB/s
Latency proxy
20.1 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Sapphire Rapids desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon Platinum 8450HSapphire Rapids · 28 cores / 56 threads · 2023
    +1.2%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon Gold 5418YSapphire Rapids · 24 cores / 48 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Xeon Gold 5411NSapphire Rapids · 24 cores / 48 threads · 2023
    −0.5%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +41.9%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +34.1%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +5.4%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRENavi IV(RX 9000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2026
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 7700Navi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −22.3%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −25.2%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −37.5%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY21.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW14 SEC DROPPED FRAMES78.46%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
macOS
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 32/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 14494,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "macos",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 2959,
        "graphics_card_id": 77
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 14,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 78.457
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 167476050.498,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4265373157.876,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 512.176
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 24.405,
            "latency_ns": 20.133
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 13.199,
            "compute_gflops": 7100.857,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 101
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 13.99975669,
        "gpu": 11.83476167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 31,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 72,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 67,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 31,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 72,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 67,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again