PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 browser benchmark
PC SCORE0OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 14 September 2026 · 23:25 EEST

Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION02:22
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU1

Processor throughput

Single thread
67.52 Mops/s
Multi thread
53.27 Mops/s
Compression proxy
0.4 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
24.1 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.8 FPS
Frame time p95
49.80 ms
MEMORY0

System memory

Effective bandwidth
1.86 GB/s
Latency proxy
1,341.0 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.68 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +129.1%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070GeForce 50 · 12 GB VRAM · 2025
    +60.9%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +23.6%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060GeForce 40 · 8 GB VRAM · 2023
    −21.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −31.3%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010GeForce 40 · 4 GB VRAM · 2024
    −85.9%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY27.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW142 SEC DROPPED FRAMES72.38%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 141814,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 2775,
        "graphics_card_id": 35
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 142,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 72.379
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 67516600.615,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 53270542.824,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 0.423
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.862,
            "latency_ns": 1340.984
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.776,
            "compute_gflops": 24.054,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 49.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.681,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 0.40766169,
        "gpu": 0.020045
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 1,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 0,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 0,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 1,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 0,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 0,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again