PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER browser benchmark
PC SCORE3OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 27 September 2026 · 18:51 EEST

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:21
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU4

Processor throughput

Single thread
56.29 Mops/s
Multi thread
191.77 Mops/s
Compression proxy
58.9 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
180.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
10.1 FPS
Frame time p95
200.50 ms
MEMORY4

System memory

Effective bandwidth
2.58 GB/s
Latency proxy
306.4 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.13 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Broadwell desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4Broadwell · 18 cores / 36 threads · 2016
    +0.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4Broadwell · 14 cores / 28 threads · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Pentium D1519Broadwell · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2016
    −61.7%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA P104-100Mining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    +32.4%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +28.2%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +8.2%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −12.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −40.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −63.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY16.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW21 SEC DROPPED FRAMES83.17%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Android
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 67/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 20856,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "android",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 2755,
        "graphics_card_id": 2361
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 21,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 83.165
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 56292852.598,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 191768147.79,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 58.852
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.577,
            "latency_ns": 306.363
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 10.072,
            "compute_gflops": 180.45,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 200.5
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.128,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 1.69791867,
        "gpu": 0.150375
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 4,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 4,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 3,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 4,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 4,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 3,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again