PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 + AMD Radeon RX 560 browser benchmark
PC SCORE22OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 16 October 2026 · 01:25 EEST

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4+AMD Radeon RX 560

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:40
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU29

Processor throughput

Single thread
313.01 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,421.90 Mops/s
Compression proxy
444.5 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
926.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.5 FPS
Frame time p95
77.80 ms
MEMORY52

System memory

Effective bandwidth
13.87 GB/s
Latency proxy
124.8 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.60 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Broadwell desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4Broadwell · 18 cores / 36 threads · 2016
    +0.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4Broadwell · 14 cores / 28 threads · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Pentium D1519Broadwell · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2016
    −61.7%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 560 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 580Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +136.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 570Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    +95.0%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.2%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 560Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon 550Polaris(RX 500) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −53.6%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 550Polaris(RX 500) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −53.6%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon 540Polaris(RX 500) · 1 GB VRAM · 2017
    −65.1%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY49.7%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW220 SEC DROPPED FRAMES50.34%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
28
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 45/100
Performance index
21.8 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 219712,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 560",
        "logical_cores": 28,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "amd",
        "gpu_architecture": "gcn-4",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 2755,
        "graphics_card_id": 45
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 220,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 50.335
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 313012649.069,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4421899471.767,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 444.538
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 13.871,
            "latency_ns": 124.77,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.534,
            "compute_gflops": 926.823,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 77.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.598,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 17.73057523,
        "gpu": 0.7723525,
        "memory": 0.72956164
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 29,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 52,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 22,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 29,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 52,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 22,
        "performance_index": 21.82,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again