PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER browser benchmark
PC SCORE14OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 10 September 2026 · 10:43 EEST

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU26

Processor throughput

Single thread
178.81 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,057.62 Mops/s
Compression proxy
360.5 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
158.0 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
35.0 FPS
Frame time p95
33.40 ms
MEMORY14

System memory

Effective bandwidth
5.59 GB/s
Latency proxy
161.7 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.97 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Skylake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon Gold 5122Skylake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2017
    +0.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5Skylake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2015
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Xeon D-2146NTSkylake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    −2.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +40.3%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +26.2%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +3.9%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA P104-100Mining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −7.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −10.2%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −24.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY58.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES42.01%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 67/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 20301,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 2559,
        "graphics_card_id": 15
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 42.006
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 178805735.528,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3057615482.901,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 360.542
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.593,
            "latency_ns": 161.743
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 34.953,
            "compute_gflops": 157.951,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 33.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.974,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 11.72653339,
        "gpu": 0.13162583
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 26,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 14,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 26,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 14,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again