PCBenchmark/Results/Intel UHD Graphics 64EU Mobile GPU browser benchmark
GPU CATEGORY SCORE0PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY69
Fair quality run 9 October 2026 · 13:27 EEST

Intel UHD Graphics 64EU Mobile

GPU category score 0/100 from the graphics-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITEGPU MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:09
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPUNOT RUN

Processor throughput

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
147.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
26.9 FPS
Frame time p95
66.68 ms
MEMORYNOT RUN

System memory

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the GPU suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

GPU POSITION

Intel UHD Graphics 64EU Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc Pro A40Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022
    +171.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Arc A350Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +139.8%higher estimate
  3. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +110.2%higher estimate
  4. Intel UHD Graphics 64EU MobileHD Graphics-M(Raptor Lake) · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY44.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW9 SEC DROPPED FRAMES55.24%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
GPU
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Firefox 151 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
1.000 ms
Run quality
Fair · 69/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "gpu",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 8588,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Processor N100",
        "gpu_name": "Intel UHD Graphics 64EU Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 151,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 2379,
        "graphics_card_id": 2681
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 9,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 55.238
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 26.94,
            "compute_gflops": 147.701,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 66.68
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 0.12308417,
        "memory": null
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same GPU suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again