PCBenchmark/Results/Intel UHD Graphics 600 Mobile VRAM browser diagnostic
VRAM DIAGNOSTICN/APRESSURE TEST
RUN QUALITY80
Good quality run 15 October 2026 · 11:56 EEST

Intel UHD Graphics 600 Mobile

No VRAM workload result was recorded, so this report does not claim a diagnostic pass or a performance score.

SUITEVRAM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:02
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Diagnostic details.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPUNOT RUN

Processor throughput

This workload was not included in the VRAM suite.

GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the VRAM suite.

MEMORYNOT RUN

System memory

This workload was not included in the VRAM suite.

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RUN QUALITY80.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW2 SEC RUN QUALITY80/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run was shorter than this mode requires.
03 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
VRAM
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
2
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Brave 151 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Run quality
Good · 80/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
04 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "vram",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 1721,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Celeron N4000",
        "gpu_name": "Intel UHD Graphics 600 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "brave",
        "browser_version": 151,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 1121,
        "graphics_card_id": 2269
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 2,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": null
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "short_duration"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": null,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": null,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same VRAM suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again