PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 browser benchmark
PC SCORE0OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 15 September 2026 · 07:07 EEST

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION04:29
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU0

Processor throughput

Single thread
4.81 Mops/s
Multi thread
9.10 Mops/s
Compression proxy
6.3 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
19.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.8 FPS
Frame time p95
2,570.40 ms
MEMORY0

System memory

Effective bandwidth
0.25 GB/s
Latency proxy
2,607.4 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMFAIL

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.00 GB/s
Tested allocation
0 MB
Validation errors
1 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain enough core and clock data to build a responsible CPU estimate for this model.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070GeForce 50 · 12 GB VRAM · 2025
    +134.4%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +80.0%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    +45.6%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GBGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    −3.3%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA TITAN XpGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017
    −7.7%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010GeForce 40 · 4 GB VRAM · 2024
    −79.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY2.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW269 SEC DROPPED FRAMES97.42%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
2
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Limited · 15/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 268505,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 34,
        "graphics_card_id": 2798
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 269,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 97.417
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 4807279.014,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 9099100.222,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 6.266
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.25,
            "latency_ns": 2607.368
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.84,
            "compute_gflops": 19.588,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 2570.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 0,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0,
            "errors": 1
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 0.11979258,
        "gpu": 0.01632333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 0,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 0,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 0,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 0,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 0,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 0,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again