PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + AMD Radeon RX 9070 browser benchmark
PC SCORE97OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADES+
Limited quality run 27 September 2026 · 18:34 EEST

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus+AMD Radeon RX 9070

Exceptional browser-level performance across the workloads measured in this suite.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:45
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
955.44 Mops/s
Multi thread
14,509.99 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,269.0 MB/s
GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
17,624.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
21.8 FPS
Frame time p95
50.00 ms
MEMORY84

System memory

Effective bandwidth
41.29 GB/s
Latency proxy
7.7 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain enough core and clock data to build a responsible CPU estimate for this model.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9070 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +34.7%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +27.3%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2023
    +3.3%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −5.1%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −29.0%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −40.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY33.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW45 SEC DROPPED FRAMES66.50%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
24
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 44777,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070",
        "logical_cores": 24,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 34,
        "graphics_card_id": 74
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 45,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 66.497
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 955437233.193,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 14509993779.158,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1268.994
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 41.286,
            "latency_ns": 7.65
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 21.777,
            "compute_gflops": 17624.741,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 50
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 54.96831383,
        "gpu": 29.37456833
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 84,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 97,
        "grade": "S+"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 84,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 97,
        "grade": "S+",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again