PC SCORE36OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Good quality run 4 September 2026 · 22:17 EEST

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K+Intel Arc 140V Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:56

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU47

Processor throughput

Single thread: 495.26 Mops/s
Multi thread: 3,796.16 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 608.3 MB/s

GPU8

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 955.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 32.9 FPS
Frame time p95: 50.00 ms

MEMORY77

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 31.78 GB/s
Latency proxy: 27.7 ns
Browser RAM class: 16 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 2.96 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Arrow Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285KArrow Lake · 24 cores / 24 threads · 2024

+7.6%higher estimate
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KArrow Lake · 20 cores / 20 threads · 2024

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KArrow Lake · 14 cores / 14 threads · 2024

−13.6%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

Intel Arc Pro A60Alchemist(Pro Series) · 12 GB VRAM · 2023

+110.5%higher estimate
Intel Arc Pro A50Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022

+20.6%higher estimate
Intel Arc A380Alchemist(Arc 3) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022

+5.3%higher estimate
Intel Arc 140V MobileArc Graphics-M(Lunar Lake) · 2024

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Arc Pro A40Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022

−12.8%lower estimate
Intel Arc A350Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

−23.1%lower estimate
Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

−32.6%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY54.1%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES45.85%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 8
Browser RAM class: 16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55561,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core Ultra 7 265K",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Arc 140V Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 31,
        "graphics_card_id": 2792
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 45.852
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 495262217.913,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3796163429.88,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 608.325
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 31.779,
            "latency_ns": 27.716
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 32.898,
            "compute_gflops": 955.574,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 50
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.964,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 21.33889463,
        "gpu": 0.79631167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 47,
        "gpu": 8,
        "memory": 77,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 36,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 47,
        "gpu": 8,
        "memory": 77,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 36,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again