PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc 130V Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE33OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 22 October 2026 · 00:28 EEST

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K+Intel Arc 130V Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:55
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU41

Processor throughput

Single thread
684.74 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,692.49 Mops/s
Compression proxy
793.4 MB/s
GPU3

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,763.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
72.2 FPS
Frame time p95
20.70 ms
MEMORY82

System memory

Effective bandwidth
33.01 GB/s
Latency proxy
170.1 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
3.26 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Arrow Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core Ultra 9 285KArrow Lake · 24 cores / 24 threads · 2024
    +7.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core Ultra 7 265KArrow Lake · 20 cores / 20 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core Ultra 5 245KArrow Lake · 14 cores / 14 threads · 2024
    −13.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel Arc 130V Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc Pro A50Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022
    +45.3%higher estimate
  2. Intel Arc A380Alchemist(Arc 3) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022
    +26.9%higher estimate
  3. Intel Arc Pro A40Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022
    +5.1%higher estimate
  4. Intel Arc 130V MobileArc Graphics-M(Lunar Lake) · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Arc A350Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −7.3%lower estimate
  6. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −18.7%lower estimate
  7. Intel Xe DG1Xe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020
    −40.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY99.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW55 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.54%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The browser reported more threads than the selected CPU has; the selected CPU is probably wrong.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
22
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Fair · 70/100
Performance index
32.9 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55072,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core Ultra 7 265K",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Arc 130V Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 22,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "xe-lpg",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 31,
        "graphics_card_id": 2791
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 55,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0.535
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 684736852.798,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3692492978.647,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 793.358
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 33.007,
            "latency_ns": 170.109,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 72.224,
            "compute_gflops": 1763.386,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 20.7
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.261,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 25.33401011,
        "gpu": 1.46948833,
        "memory": 1.14992598
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "thread_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 41,
        "gpu": 3,
        "memory": 82,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 33,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 41,
        "gpu": 3,
        "memory": 82,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 33,
        "performance_index": 32.88,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again