PC SCORE36OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Limited quality run 9 October 2026 · 00:02 EEST

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K+Matrox Parhelia 128 MB

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:56

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU59

Processor throughput

Single thread: 789.50 Mops/s
Multi thread: 6,820.71 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 1,006.7 MB/s

GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 437.0 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 48.9 FPS
Frame time p95: 33.40 ms

MEMORY64

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 22.29 GB/s
Latency proxy: 169.3 ns
Browser RAM class: 8 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 2.44 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Arrow Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KArrow Lake · 20 cores / 20 threads · 2024

+15.8%higher estimate
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KArrow Lake · 14 cores / 14 threads · 2024

BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain a trustworthy theoretical compute reference for this GPU.

03 / STABILITY81.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES18.52%

Why the run quality was reduced

Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 10
Browser RAM class: 8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Browser: Chrome 152 · Blink engine
Timer resolution: 0.100 ms
Memory working set: 256 MB
Run quality: Limited · 41/100
Performance index: 35.7 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard: Ranked
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale: Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 56112,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core Ultra 5 245K",
        "gpu_name": "Matrox Parhelia 128 MB",
        "logical_cores": 10,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 152,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "xe-lpg",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 30,
        "graphics_card_id": 348
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 18.515
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 789504788.534,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 6820713438.332,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1006.73
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 22.286,
            "latency_ns": 169.25,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 48.925,
            "compute_gflops": 436.965,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 33.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.444,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 35.9525068,
        "gpu": 0.3641375,
        "memory": 0.89241394
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "thread_cap",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 59,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 64,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 36,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 59,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 64,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 36,
        "performance_index": 35.7,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again