PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-9820X X-series CPU browser benchmark
CPU CATEGORY SCORE38PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY100
Excellent quality run 17 October 2026 · 21:13 EEST

Intel Core i9-9820X X-series

CPU category score 38/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODESTANDARD GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:27
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU38

Processor throughput

Single thread
707.45 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,616.34 Mops/s
Compression proxy
302.8 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY40

System memory

Effective bandwidth
10.73 GB/s
Latency proxy
165.5 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-9820X X-series comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Skylake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon W-3175XSkylake · 28 cores / 56 threads · 2018
    +38.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-9800X X-seriesSkylake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    +0.9%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i9-9820X X-seriesSkylake · 10 cores / 20 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i7-7820X X-seriesSkylake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2017
    −1.3%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i5-6685RSkylake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2016
    −41.9%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY100.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW27 SEC RUN QUALITY100/100
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
CPU + Memory
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
20
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
NOT RUN
Browser
Firefox 158 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
1.000 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 100/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 27117,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-9820X X-series",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA RTX A6000",
        "logical_cores": 20,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 158,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "processor_id": 2028,
        "graphics_card_id": 2471
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 27,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 707452238.516,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4616335294.019,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 302.825
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 10.732,
            "latency_ns": 165.546,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 23.14775512,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.55930847
    },
    "quality_flags": [],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 38,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 40,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 38,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 40,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again