PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 browser benchmark
PC SCORE83OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEA
Excellent quality run 13 October 2026 · 15:34 EEST

Intel Core i9-13900K+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Excellent performance with a strong balance across the measured workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU84

Processor throughput

Single thread
937.97 Mops/s
Multi thread
14,461.50 Mops/s
Compression proxy
960.5 MB/s
GPU79

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
40,606.3 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
59.0 FPS
Frame time p95
17.20 ms
MEMORY91

System memory

Effective bandwidth
32.91 GB/s
Latency proxy
126.1 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
5.02 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-13900K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-13900KSRaptor Lake · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2023
    +4.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-13900KRaptor Lake · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i7-13700KRaptor Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2022
    −12.8%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-13600KRaptor Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2022
    −19.8%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-13100Raptor Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2023
    −52.9%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090GeForce 50 · 32 GB VRAM · 2025
    +26.9%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA RTX 6000DBlackwell PRO W(x000) · 84 GB VRAM · 2025
    +17.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090GeForce 40 · 24 GB VRAM · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPERGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    −36.8%lower estimate
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080GeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2022
    −41.0%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPERGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    −46.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY98.1%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES1.95%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
32
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 92/100
Performance index
83.0 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 20279,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-13900K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090",
        "logical_cores": 32,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "lovelace",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 26,
        "graphics_card_id": 27
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 1.948
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 937970392.027,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 14461496626.748,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 960.51
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 32.914,
            "latency_ns": 126.07,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 58.974,
            "compute_gflops": 40606.276,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.016,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 51.5387727,
        "gpu": 33.83856333,
        "memory": 1.27471713
    },
    "quality_flags": [],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 84,
        "gpu": 79,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 83,
        "grade": "A"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 84,
        "gpu": 79,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 83,
        "performance_index": 82.97,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "A",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again