PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-13900 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 browser benchmark
PC SCORE16OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 9 October 2026 · 07:58 EEST

Intel Core i9-13900+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:39
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU19

Processor throughput

Single thread
404.16 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,627.06 Mops/s
Compression proxy
229.5 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,193.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.0 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY42

System memory

Effective bandwidth
9.72 GB/s
Latency proxy
122.7 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.81 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-13900 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-13700KRaptor Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2022
    +4.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-13900Raptor Lake · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-13600KRaptor Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2022
    −3.7%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i7-13700Raptor Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2023
    −15.6%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-13100Raptor Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2023
    −43.4%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +247.3%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    +135.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +15.1%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −39.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −51.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2021
    −59.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW219 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 50/100
Performance index
16.0 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218629,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-13900",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "pascal",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 2009,
        "graphics_card_id": 1
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 219,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 404157218.504,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1627057305.115,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 229.453
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 9.719,
            "latency_ns": 122.676,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0,
            "compute_gflops": 1193.899,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.814,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 11.53434055,
        "gpu": 0.99491583,
        "memory": 0.58239638
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 19,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 16,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 19,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 16,
        "performance_index": 16.02,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again