PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-12900KS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE60OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEC
Excellent quality run 11 October 2026 · 00:13 EEST

Intel Core i9-12900KS+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU71

Processor throughput

Single thread
840.85 Mops/s
Multi thread
10,932.23 Mops/s
Compression proxy
927.0 MB/s
GPU31

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
16,278.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
427.7 FPS
Frame time p95
2.20 ms
MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth
37.38 GB/s
Latency proxy
96.4 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
5.31 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-12900KS comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Alder Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. Intel Core i9-12900KSAlder Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. Intel Core i7-12700KAlder Lake · 12 cores / 20 threads · 2021
    −12.4%lower estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-12600KAlder Lake · 10 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    −19.2%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i3-12300Alder Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    −46.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPERGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +30.6%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080GeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2022
    +21.9%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPERGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +10.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce 30 · 24 GB VRAM · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090GeForce 30 · 24 GB VRAM · 2020
    −11.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    −14.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080GeForce 30 · 10 GB VRAM · 2020
    −25.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY98.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES1.17%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
24
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 92/100
Performance index
61.5 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19971,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-12900KS",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 24,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "ampere",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 2005,
        "graphics_card_id": 25
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 1.173
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 840850752.459,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 10932234157.101,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 927.02
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 37.375,
            "latency_ns": 96.369,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 427.709,
            "compute_gflops": 16278.879,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 2.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.309,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 43.79874877,
        "gpu": 13.5657325,
        "memory": 1.52100349
    },
    "quality_flags": [],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 71,
        "gpu": 31,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 60,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 71,
        "gpu": 31,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 60,
        "performance_index": 61.5,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again