PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-12900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 browser benchmark
PC SCORE80OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEA
Good quality run 31 August 2026 · 17:04 EEST

Intel Core i9-12900K+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

Excellent performance with a strong balance across the measured workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
871.40 Mops/s
Multi thread
11,937.61 Mops/s
Compression proxy
855.9 MB/s
GPU58

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
6,911.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
48.5 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY82

System memory

Effective bandwidth
37.38 GB/s
Latency proxy
13.7 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.72 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-12900K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Alder Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-12900KSAlder Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2022
    +6.0%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-12900KAlder Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i7-12700KAlder Lake · 12 cores / 20 threads · 2021
    −7.2%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-12600KAlder Lake · 10 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    −14.4%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-12300Alder Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    −43.4%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 family estimateThe browser-visible name cannot distinguish every board variant, so the launch family reference is used. Percentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    +70.7%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070GeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +59.4%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +27.2%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060GeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    BASEFAMILY REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    −12.5%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    −28.6%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    −28.9%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY80.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES19.21%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
24
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 86/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 217957,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-12900K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060",
        "logical_cores": 24,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 22,
        "graphics_card_id": 22
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 19.213
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 871400961.887,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 11937614028.288,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 855.918
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 37.384,
            "latency_ns": 13.681
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 48.481,
            "compute_gflops": 6911.593,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.717,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 45.29115596,
        "gpu": 5.75966083
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 58,
        "memory": 82,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 80,
        "grade": "A"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 58,
        "memory": 82,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 80,
        "grade": "A",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again