PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-12900H + rtxada2000 browser benchmark
PC SCORE38OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 1 October 2026 · 22:12 EEST

Intel Core i9-12900H+rtxada2000

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:56
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU36

Processor throughput

Single thread
281.85 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,619.90 Mops/s
Compression proxy
337.8 MB/s
GPU31

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
3,686.3 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
53.6 FPS
Frame time p95
17.00 ms
MEMORY58

System memory

Effective bandwidth
19.15 GB/s
Latency proxy
48.6 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.87 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-12900H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Alder Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-12800HXAlder Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2022
    +2.0%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-12900HAlder Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i7-12800HAlder Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2022
    −4.0%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-12600HXAlder Lake · 12 cores / 16 threads · 2022
    −14.4%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-1220PAlder Lake · 10 cores / 12 threads · 2022
    −25.0%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

rtxada2000 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY89.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES10.65%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
20
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 92/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55625,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-12900H",
        "gpu_name": "rtxada2000",
        "logical_cores": 20,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 2001
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 10.652
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 281846313.987,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4619903277.548,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 337.801
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 19.145,
            "latency_ns": 48.613
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 53.605,
            "compute_gflops": 3686.336,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.874,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 16.37808156,
        "gpu": 3.07194667
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 36,
        "gpu": 31,
        "memory": 58,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 38,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 36,
        "gpu": 31,
        "memory": 58,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 38,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again