PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i9-11900 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 browser benchmark
PC SCORE43OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 14 October 2026 · 08:52 EEST

Intel Core i9-11900+NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:56
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU47

Processor throughput

Single thread
642.37 Mops/s
Multi thread
5,594.86 Mops/s
Compression proxy
790.3 MB/s
GPU17

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
8,865.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
52.7 FPS
Frame time p95
17.00 ms
MEMORY92

System memory

Effective bandwidth
29.76 GB/s
Latency proxy
101.6 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.51 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i9-11900 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Rocket Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-11700KRocket Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +13.0%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i5-11600KRocket Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +2.8%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i9-11900Rocket Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i7-11700Rocket Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    −3.5%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i5-11600Rocket Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    −11.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090GeForce 30 · 24 GB VRAM · 2020
    +118.1%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080GeForce 30 · 10 GB VRAM · 2020
    +82.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070GeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +24.5%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000Quadro Turing(Tx000) · 24 GB VRAM · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    −0.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA TITAN VGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017
    −8.6%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA TITAN V CEO EditionGeForce 10 · 32 GB VRAM · 2018
    −8.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY87.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES12.25%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 99/100
Performance index
42.8 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55816,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i9-11900",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "turing",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1991,
        "graphics_card_id": 2298
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 12.247
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 642365357.908,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 5594861929.619,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 790.251
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 29.756,
            "latency_ns": 101.591,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 52.682,
            "compute_gflops": 8865.447,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.513,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 29.13763851,
        "gpu": 7.3878725,
        "memory": 1.28752191
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 47,
        "gpu": 17,
        "memory": 92,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 43,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 47,
        "gpu": 17,
        "memory": 92,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 43,
        "performance_index": 42.83,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again