PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-9750H + NVIDIA T1000 browser benchmark
PC SCORE16OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 3 October 2026 · 21:00 EEST

Intel Core i7-9750H+NVIDIA T1000

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:59
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU20

Processor throughput

Single thread
246.10 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,786.07 Mops/s
Compression proxy
158.9 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
141.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
21.9 FPS
Frame time p95
33.80 ms
MEMORY44

System memory

Effective bandwidth
10.17 GB/s
Latency proxy
46.1 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.17 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-9750H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-8950HKCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    +8.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon E-2276MCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    +5.7%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-9750HCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i5-8500BCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2018
    −9.8%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-8109UCoffee Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    −40.3%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA T1000 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +19.2%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA P106MMining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +18.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    +12.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA T1000Quadro Turing(Tx000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −8.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −26.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12WGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −33.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY36.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW59 SEC DROPPED FRAMES63.59%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 58600,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-9750H",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA T1000",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1969,
        "graphics_card_id": 2577
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 59,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 63.588
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 246102585.993,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1786070274.856,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 158.934
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 10.17,
            "latency_ns": 46.071
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 21.854,
            "compute_gflops": 141.621,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 33.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.167,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 9.12267067,
        "gpu": 0.1180175
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 44,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 16,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 44,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 16,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again