PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-9750H + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q browser benchmark
PC SCORE13OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 11 October 2026 · 12:41 EEST

Intel Core i7-9750H+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:57
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU17

Processor throughput

Single thread
355.03 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,553.61 Mops/s
Compression proxy
218.6 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
133.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.5 FPS
Frame time p95
517.30 ms
MEMORY34

System memory

Effective bandwidth
9.14 GB/s
Latency proxy
200.2 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.91 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-9750H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-8950HKCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    +8.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon E-2276MCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    +5.7%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-9750HCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i5-8500BCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2018
    −9.8%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-8109UCoffee Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    −40.3%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +92.2%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA P106MMining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +29.1%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    +22.6%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce 16 Mobile · 4 GB VRAM · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −20.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12WGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −27.4%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce MX350GeForce MX(3xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −47.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY27.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW57 SEC DROPPED FRAMES72.61%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 0/100
Performance index
13.2 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 57402,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-9750H",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "gen-9",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1969,
        "graphics_card_id": 2358
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 57,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 72.608
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 355031848.006,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1553607436.757,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 218.571
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 9.141,
            "latency_ns": 200.188,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.457,
            "compute_gflops": 133.224,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 517.3
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.911,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 10.64718244,
        "gpu": 0.11102,
        "memory": 0.47149067
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "dropped_frames",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 34,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 13,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 34,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 13,
        "performance_index": 13.19,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again