PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-9700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 browser benchmark
PC SCORE29OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 12 October 2026 · 21:20 EEST

Intel Core i7-9700K+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:49
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU33

Processor throughput

Single thread
600.62 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,272.81 Mops/s
Compression proxy
835.0 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
201.3 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.1 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY83

System memory

Effective bandwidth
27.91 GB/s
Latency proxy
119.9 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-9700K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake Refresh desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-9900KCoffee Lake Refresh · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    +12.4%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-9700KCoffee Lake Refresh · 8 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-9600KCoffee Lake Refresh · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2018
    −13.2%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA TITAN X PascalGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2016
    +69.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +37.3%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +26.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    −32.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −66.9%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −71.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW49 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Good · 85/100
Performance index
28.5 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 49290,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-9700K",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "processor_id": 8,
        "graphics_card_id": 4
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 49,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 600623554.858,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2272812983.476,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 834.976
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 27.912,
            "latency_ns": 119.864,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.051,
            "compute_gflops": 201.253,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 20.00202517,
        "gpu": 0.33542167,
        "memory": 1.16561078
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 33,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 83,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 29,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 33,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 83,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 29,
        "performance_index": 28.45,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again