PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-9700 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q browser benchmark
PC SCORE25OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 22 October 2026 · 15:12 EEST

Intel Core i7-9700+NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:55
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU27

Processor throughput

Single thread
497.65 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,976.76 Mops/s
Compression proxy
667.7 MB/s
GPU4

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,825.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
55.9 FPS
Frame time p95
17.00 ms
MEMORY68

System memory

Effective bandwidth
19.69 GB/s
Latency proxy
112.1 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.77 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-9700 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-9900Coffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    +16.8%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-9700Coffee Lake · 8 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-9600KFCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2019
    −4.3%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i9-9900TCoffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019
    −7.4%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i3-9350KCoffee Lake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2019
    −16.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +15.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +5.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +1.6%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro Turing-M(Tx000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA P104-100Mining GPUs · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −5.8%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −8.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −23.1%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY93.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW55 SEC DROPPED FRAMES6.80%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Brave 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Good · 85/100
Performance index
24.7 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55233,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-9700",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "brave",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1962,
        "graphics_card_id": 2384
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 55,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 6.801
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 497649447.82,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1976757147.777,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 667.727
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 19.694,
            "latency_ns": 112.054,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 55.881,
            "compute_gflops": 1825.599,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.768,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 16.77811904,
        "gpu": 1.5213325,
        "memory": 0.95136678
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 27,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 68,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 25,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 27,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 68,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 25,
        "performance_index": 24.69,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again