PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-8565U + AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 browser benchmark
PC SCORE19OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 12 October 2026 · 08:49 EEST

Intel Core i7-8565U+AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:57
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU24

Processor throughput

Single thread
429.46 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,763.37 Mops/s
Compression proxy
578.8 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
154.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
21.6 FPS
Frame time p95
533.20 ms
MEMORY53

System memory

Effective bandwidth
15.96 GB/s
Latency proxy
152.2 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.93 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-8565U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Whiskey Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-8665UWhiskey Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    +4.8%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-8565UWhiskey Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-8365UWhiskey Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    −11.0%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core i3-8145UWhiskey Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    −27.0%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon R9 M470XGem System(R9 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +57.6%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon E9260 MXMEmbedded(9000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +51.2%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon R9 M470Gem System(R9 M400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +23.2%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100Radeon Pro Polaris(WX x100) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon 550Polaris(RX 500) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −3.2%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 550Polaris(RX 500) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −3.2%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon R7 350 640SPPirate Islands(R7 300) · 2 GB VRAM · 2019
    −5.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY36.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW57 SEC DROPPED FRAMES63.95%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 35/100
Performance index
19.4 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 56972,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-8565U",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "gen-9",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1934,
        "graphics_card_id": 2240
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 57,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 63.952
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 429464705.796,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1763372781.419,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 578.789
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 15.955,
            "latency_ns": 152.165,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 21.643,
            "compute_gflops": 154.408,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 533.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.925,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 14.68538864,
        "gpu": 0.12867333,
        "memory": 0.74542381
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 24,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 53,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 19,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 24,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 53,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 19,
        "performance_index": 19.36,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again